Posts Tagged 'LEGAL'

Zandu promoters-Emami fight enters courtroom

Zandu promoters-Emami fight enters courtroom
7 Aug, 2008, 0108 hrs IST

MUMBAI: The battle between Kolkata-based Emami and the Mumbai-based Parikh family over the control of Zandu Pharmaceuticals Works has reached the courtroom. The Parikhs, promoters of Zandu, have filed a petition in the Bombay High Court challenging Emami’s purchase of shares in the company from the Vaidyas, co-promoters of Zandu. On the other hand, Emami has sent legal notices to directors of Zandu claiming it has not received the agenda of Zandu’s annual general meeting to be held on August 9.

Zandu Pharmaceuticals’ chairman and leading corporate lawyer, YP Trivedi confirmed the legal tussle between the Parikhs and Emami. He said: “I am against any litigation. Litigation is always useful only for lawyers. I have asked both the parties to sit together and resolve all the differences.” Emami has appointed law firm Kanga & Company while Zia Mody is representing the Parikhs. Zandu’s managing director Girish Parikh was not available for comment.

The Parikhs moved the high court after they failed to get a stay on Emami’s acquisition of Zandu shares from the Company Law Board (CLB). Emami bought the shares from the Vaidya family for around Rs 120 crore in May this year. The Parikhs have claimed that they enjoy the right of first refusal (RoFR) in the case of sale of shares by the Vaidyas and therefore, the transaction was illegal. The Parikhs hold nearly 25% stake.

The CLB had advised the Parikh Group to approach the stock market regulator, Sebi, over the Vaidyas’ alleged violation of the RoFR. Accordingly, the Parikh Group moved Sebi on the matter. Sebi is yet to clear the mandatory open offer to be launched by Emami. Under Indian laws, any acquisition beyond 15% is required to be followed by a mandatory 20% open offer. Emami has to launch the mandatory offer, subject to Sebi approval, as its holding in Zandu is 27.5%.

Emami denied that there was any such RoFR between the promoters of Zandu. An Emami official said they — Emami and its advisor Anand Rathi — had done proper due diligence on the so-called RoFR issue before the purchase of Zandu shares from the Vaidyas. The Parikh and the Vaidya family set up Zandu more than a century ago.

In a communication dated August 4 to the Zandu directors with copies to the stock exchanges, Emami said the shareholders should receive the agenda of the AGM as per the Companies’ Act, 1956. Emami sources said that Zandu had not transferred some shares to Emami which it had bought from the Vaidyas in physical forms.

The AGM assumes significance as five nominees of the Parikh family would seek the shareholders’ nod to be appointed on the Zandu board. The Zandu board is dominated by independent directors, which includes MR Trivedi and also PP Vora, K Natarajan, SS Handa and AV Shah. On June 7, the same board had dropped a proposal to offer shares to the Parikhs on a preferential basis following a legal notice from Emami.

The Zandu share price, meanwhile, went up 5% to Rs 17,272 a share on Wednesday on the Bombay Stock Exchange compared to Emami’s open offer price of Rs 7,315. Ever since Emami has launched the takeover bid, the Parikhs are buying shares from the market, leading to an unusual rise in its share prices, disclosures to the stock exchanges show.

Price of KG gas not negotiable: RIL lawyer

Price of KG gas not negotiable: RIL lawyer
7 Aug, 2008, 1805 hrs IST, PTI

MUMBAI: Reliance Industries will not “scale down” production from Krishna Godavari basin to accommodate RNRL’s future needs, nor would it renegotiate the government- approved price of the gas, the Bombay High Court was told on Thursday.

Anil Ambani’s RNRL is locked in a legal dispute over the terms of Gas Supply Master Agreement with RIL, controlled by elder Ambani sibling Mukesh. As per the disputed GSMA, RIL agrees to supply gas to RNRL for the latter’s power-generation projects.

“These things (price, scale of production) are not negotiable… We are not going to subsidise you (Reliance Natural Resources Ltd),” Harish Salve, RIL’s counsel said.

Price is one of the contentious issues in the present GSMA. Reliance Industries’ stand is that price determined by the two parties must be subject to government’s approval, while RNRL’s stand is that government has nothing to do with price at which RNRL is due to get the gas from RIL.

Salve also said that though RNRL’s power plant in Dadri, Uttar Pradesh, was yet to come up, RIL was not ready to halt the gas production from KG basin, which will start by next month.

Since RNRL finds that GSMA is “not bankable”, it moved HC last year. RNRL says that GSMA does not guarantee certainty of price, tenure of supply and even the quantity.

But Salve said in his concluding argument today that “these were just 3 or 4 weak points…there is no need to tinker with the GSMA.”

As per the Reliance demerger scheme, Anil and Mukesh groups were to work out a suitable agreement for gas supply by RIL to RNRL.